PROMPT DETAILS Updated 2026-05-17
The Prompt
Help me find and format citations for a paper about: [TOPIC]
I need:
1. **Source suggestions:** Recommend 10 key papers/sources I should cite, covering:
- Foundational works (the classics everyone cites)
- Recent advances (last 2-3 years)
- Contrarian/critical perspectives
- Methodological references
For each: author, year, title, and ONE sentence on why it's relevant
2. **Citation formatting:** Format the following sources in [APA 7th / MLA 9 / Chicago / IEEE] style:
[PASTE RAW CITATION INFO]
3. **In-text citation guidance:**
- When to use direct quotes vs paraphrasing
- How to cite multiple sources for one claim
- How to indicate disagreement between sources
- Signal phrases for different purposes (support, contrast, extend)
4. **Citation integrity check:**
- Am I over-citing one source?
- Are there perspective gaps in my citations?
- Am I citing primary sources or relying on secondary?
- Are any sources potentially predatory journals?
Note: Verify all suggested citations exist before using them — AI can hallucinate references.
How To Use It
Describe your paper topic and citation style needed. Use the suggestions as starting points for your own literature search — always verify citations exist using Google Scholar or your library database.
Why It Works
Citation is both a research skill (finding the right sources) and a mechanical skill (formatting correctly). This prompt handles both while teaching good citation practices like source diversity and the distinction between primary and secondary sources.
Variations
Annotated bibliography:
Create an annotated bibliography for these 8 sources. For each: formatted citation + 150-word annotation covering summary, methodology, and relevance to my research question: [QUESTION].
Citation audit:
Review my reference list for: formatting inconsistencies, missing information, suspicious entries (might not exist), and over-reliance on any single author or year.
Source evaluation:
Evaluate this source for academic use: journal reputation, methodology rigor, citation count, potential biases, and whether it would strengthen or weaken my argument about [CLAIM].